European Parliament Report Warns Of ‘Institutional Deterioration And Rising Corruption’ In Spain

BRUSSELS/MADRID — A new report issued by the European Parliament has raised serious concerns about the state of democratic institutions in Spain, warning of “institutional deterioration and an increase in corruption” that could undermine public trust and compromise the country’s adherence to European rule-of-law standards.

Businessman Claims Sánchez Led Alleged Corruption Network in Transport Ministry Trial

The document, drafted following a fact-finding mission by a delegation of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) conducted on February 16 and 17, cautions that Spain is experiencing “a decline in confidence in several state institutions” and highlights dynamics that “may compromise the perception of impartiality and institutional balance” required under European criteria.

The report comes at a sensitive moment for Spanish democracy, as the country navigates a fragmented political landscape, ongoing judicial reform debates, and heightened polarization across media and public institutions. While Spain remains a consolidated democracy within the European Union, the MEPs’ findings suggest that certain trends warrant close monitoring to prevent further erosion of democratic safeguards.

One of the report’s most pointed criticisms concerns the Spanish government’s lack of cooperation with the parliamentary mission. According to the document, Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and several cabinet ministers declined to meet with the European delegation during its visit to Madrid, a decision that the MEPs interpreted as a missed opportunity for constructive dialogue on rule-of-law issues.

The independence of the judiciary emerges as a central concern throughout the report. The document specifically highlights persistent doubts about the current system for appointing members of the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), Spain’s governing body for judges. Despite commitments made by the government to align the selection process with European standards, the report notes that no substantive reform has been enacted, leaving the institution vulnerable to perceptions of political influence.

“The accumulation of institutional tensions can ultimately erode public confidence in the justice system,” the report states, emphasizing that judicial independence is not merely a technical matter but a foundational element of democratic legitimacy. The MEPs recall that the European Commission and the Venice Commission have repeatedly recommended reforms to ensure that judicial appointments are insulated from partisan considerations.

Beyond the judiciary, the report identifies several other areas of concern. It notes the Spanish government’s recurrent use of royal decree-laws—emergency legislative instruments that bypass ordinary parliamentary debate—to advance politically sensitive reforms. While such mechanisms are legally permissible under specific circumstances, the delegation warns that their frequent application “may limit deliberation and weaken consultative mechanisms,” particularly when employed for policies that do not meet the threshold of urgent necessity.

The document also expresses concern about what it describes as “legislative gridlock, a lack of negotiation, and growing executive dominance” in Spain’s political system. These dynamics, the report suggests, can marginalize opposition voices and reduce the quality of democratic decision-making, especially in a multiparty parliament where coalition-building and compromise are essential.

On the issue of corruption, the report points to a deterioration in Spain’s performance on international perception indices, which have reportedly reached “their lowest level since 2012.” While perception metrics do not necessarily reflect actual corruption levels, the MEPs caution that declining scores can undermine investor confidence and public trust. The report further warns that delays in resolving complex corruption cases may affect the credibility of Spain’s anti-corruption efforts, emphasizing the need for timely and transparent judicial proceedings.

Media freedom and the governance of public broadcasting also feature prominently in the delegation’s findings. The report expresses specific concern about the independent governance of RTVE, Spain’s public radio and television corporation, particularly in a context of high political polarization. Ensuring that public media operate free from partisan interference is considered essential for maintaining informed public debate and equitable access to information.

Javier Zarzalejos, a Member of the European Parliament from the Popular Party (PP) and co-chair of the mission to Spain, characterized the report as a wake-up call for Spanish authorities. “This document makes clear that there are serious problems and a progressive deterioration of the rule of law in Spain that can no longer be ignored,” Zarzalejos stated in Brussels. He criticized the government for failing to fulfill its commitment to reform the judicial appointment system in line with European benchmarks and warned of “a continued abuse of royal decree-laws as a formula to weaken parliamentary deliberation and sideline Congress.”

Zarzalejos also called for “a firm legal, administrative, and political strategy against corruption,” arguing that “when corruption is normalized or tolerated, it ends up contaminating the functioning of the rule of law and eroding citizens’ trust in institutions.”

The Spanish government has not yet issued a formal response to the report, though sources close to the executive have suggested that Madrid views some of the MEPs’ conclusions as politically motivated or based on an incomplete understanding of Spain’s institutional framework. Supporters of the government argue that Spain’s democratic institutions remain robust and that ongoing reforms, including those related to judicial governance and anti-corruption measures, demonstrate a commitment to continuous improvement.

Opposition parties, however, have seized on the report to reinforce their criticisms of the current administration. Leaders from the Popular Party and Vox have cited the document as validation of their claims that the government is undermining democratic checks and balances. Meanwhile, regional parties and civil society organizations have called for inclusive dialogue to address the concerns raised without exacerbating political divisions.

Legal scholars and European affairs experts note that while the European Parliament’s reports carry significant political weight, they are not legally binding. However, persistent rule-of-law concerns can trigger procedures under Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, which allows for sanctions against member states found to be at risk of seriously breaching EU values. To date, such procedures have been initiated against Poland and Hungary, but not Spain.

The report also arrives amid broader European debates about democratic resilience, disinformation, and the challenges of maintaining institutional trust in an era of rapid social and technological change. Many EU member states face similar pressures, and the Spanish case is being watched as a test of whether established democracies can address internal tensions while upholding shared European standards.

For Spanish citizens, the findings underscore the importance of civic engagement, transparent governance, and accountability across all branches of government. Public trust, the report reminds, is not a static asset but a dynamic relationship that requires constant nurturing through fair processes, ethical leadership, and responsive institutions.

As the European Parliament prepares to discuss the report in plenary session, attention will turn to whether its recommendations prompt concrete action from Spanish authorities or further political debate. For now, the document stands as a significant intervention in Spain’s ongoing conversation about democracy, institutions, and the rule of law.

Corruption scandals have Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez cornered

Note: This report is based on the official European Parliament document, statements from MEPs, and analysis from legal and political experts. The European Parliament’s fact-finding missions are part of its broader mandate to monitor rule-of-law compliance across EU member states. All political actors mentioned are presumed to act in accordance with applicable legal and democratic frameworks.

Reporting from Brussels and Madrid. Additional contributions from European affairs correspondents and constitutional law analysts.